ChetBets College Football — 30-Day Performance — September 15, 2026
No college-football event today and no official position issued. The recovered September 5 card is 5–1; units, ROI, and CLV are unavailable.
ChetBets College Football — Rolling 30-Day Performance Report
Window: August 17–September 15, 2026
Today: no college-football event is scheduled, and no official position was issued. The next listed college game is Syracuse at Pittsburgh on September 17. Schedule/result reference: NCAA college-football schedule and scores.
Syracuse
PittsburghThe recovered September 5 card is the only fully graded Chet college-football ledger in the window. It finished 5–1 (83.33%). Exact units were never stated, so risked units, net units, ROI, and unit-size performance remain unavailable.
Date-by-date ledger
| Date | Ledger status | W-L | Risk | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 18 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 19 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 20 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 21 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 22 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 23 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 24 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 25 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 26 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 27 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 28 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 29 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 30 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 31 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 1 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 2 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 3 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 4 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 5 | Recovered and graded six-position card | 5–1 | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Sep 6 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 7 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 8 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 9 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 10 | College games completed; no controlling Chet graded card recovered | — | — | — |
| Sep 11 | College games completed; no controlling Chet graded card recovered | — | — | — |
| Sep 12 | College games completed; no controlling Chet graded card recovered | — | — | — |
| Sep 13 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 14 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 15 | No college-football event scheduled; no official position issued | 0–0 | 0.00u | 0.0000u |
Exact recovered performance
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Recovered official positions | 6 |
| Settled W-L-P | 5–1–0 |
| Win rate | 83.33% |
| Risked units | Unavailable |
| Net units | Unavailable |
| ROI | Unavailable |
| Fully graded dates | 1 — Sep. 5 |
Recovered graded positions
| Rank | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Morning Pick 1 | Houston -21 vs Oregon State | LOSS |
| Morning Pick 2 | Pittsburgh -16.5 vs Miami (Ohio) | WIN |
| Morning Pick 3 | Alabama -28 vs East Carolina | WIN |
| Main Pick 1 | Memphis -8.5 vs Arkansas State | WIN |
| Main Pick 2 | Texas -29.5 vs Texas State | WIN |
| Main Pick 3 | Georgia -46.5 vs Tennessee State | WIN |
Houston
Oregon State
Miami
Ohio
Alabama
East Carolina
Memphis
Arkansas State
Texas
Texas State
Georgia
Tennessee StateThe score record is independently consistent with the NCAA results page.
Daily performance
| Date | W-L | Win rate | Risk | Net | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep. 5 | 5–1 | 83.33% | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable |
Rank performance
| Rank | W-L | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Pick 1 | 1–1 | 50.00% |
| Pick 2 | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| Pick 3 | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| Picks 4–5 | 0–0 | — |
Market and favorite/underdog performance
| Category | W-L | Win rate | Units / ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Point spreads | 5–1 | 83.33% | Unavailable |
| Favorites | 5–1 | 83.33% | Unavailable |
| Underdogs | 0–0 | — | Not applicable |
| Totals / moneylines / props | 0–0 | — | Not applicable |
Unit-sizing performance
Unavailable. The recovered reports did not preserve unit assignments, so no sizing bucket or unit ROI has been invented.
Closing-line value
Certified aggregate CLV: UNAVAILABLE. Posted spread thresholds were preserved, but no complete timestamped, same-sportsbook entry-versus-close series exists.
Strengths
- The recovered card won five of six positions.
- Pick 2 and Pick 3 were both 2–0.
- All six positions were point spreads, producing a clean but very small market sample.
Weaknesses
- Pick 1 split 1–1 and contained the card's only loss.
- Unit profitability, sizing efficiency, and CLV cannot be evaluated.
- One graded date is insufficient for a durable model conclusion.
Data-integrity exceptions
- Exact units were not stated; the required performance row uses 0 only as the existing schema's placeholder for unavailable unit fields, not as a claim of zero risk.
- No other controlling college-football card was recovered for this window.
- Missing dates are not assumed to be no-action dates.
Model changes: none.