ChetBets College Football — 30-Day Performance — September 18, 2026
Recovered record remains 5–1–0 (83.33%). Units, ROI and CLV are unavailable; September 15–17 are verified no-action dates and 25 completed dates remain unresolved.
ChetBets College Football — Rolling 30-Day Performance Report
Reconciled window: August 20–September 18, 2026
The only recovered graded college-football card remains September 5 at 5–1–0 (83.33%). September 15 and 16 had no same-day events and no positions; September 17's one-event board was a verified full pass. September 18 is an in-progress date and is not treated as a settled no-action day. The recovered September 5 reports did not preserve units, so risked units, net units, ROI and unit-size performance remain unavailable.
Result reference: NCAA college-football schedule and scores.
Complete date-by-date ledger
| Date | Ledger status | W-L-P | Risk | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 21 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 22 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 23 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 24 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 25 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 26 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 27 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 28 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 29 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 30 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Aug 31 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 1 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 2 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 3 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 4 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 5 | Recovered and graded six-position card; units unavailable | 5–1–0 | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Sep 6 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 7 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 8 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 9 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 10 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 11 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 12 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 13 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 14 | No recoverable controlling Chet card | — | — | — |
| Sep 15 | No college-football event; verified no official position | 0–0–0 | 0.00u | 0.0000u |
| Sep 16 | No same-day college-football event; controlling Final issued no position | 0–0–0 | 0.00u | 0.0000u |
| Sep 17 | One-event slate; controlling Final full pass | 0–0–0 | 0.00u | 0.0000u |
| Sep 18 | Current report date; cutoff precedes the September 18 Final card and settlement | — | — | — |
Exact recovered performance
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Recovered official positions | 6 |
| Settled W-L-P | 5–1–0 |
| Win rate | 83.33% |
| Risked units | Unavailable |
| Net units | Unavailable |
| ROI | Unavailable |
| Fully graded dates | 1 — Sep. 5 |
| Verified no-action dates | 3 — Sep. 15, 16, 17 |
| Unresolved completed dates | 25 |
| Certified aggregate CLV | Unavailable |
Recovered graded positions
| Rank group | Exact position | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Morning Pick 1 | Houston -21 vs Oregon State | LOSS |
| Morning Pick 2 | Pittsburgh -16.5 vs Miami (Ohio) | WIN |
| Morning Pick 3 | Alabama -28 vs East Carolina | WIN |
| Main Pick 1 | Memphis -8.5 vs Arkansas State | WIN |
| Main Pick 2 | Texas -29.5 vs Texas State | WIN |
| Main Pick 3 | Georgia -46.5 vs Tennessee State | WIN |
Daily performance
| Date | W-L-P | Win rate | Risk | Net | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep. 5 | 5–1–0 | 83.33% | Unavailable | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Sep. 15 | 0–0–0 | N/A | 0.00u | 0.0000u | N/A |
| Sep. 16 | 0–0–0 | N/A | 0.00u | 0.0000u | N/A |
| Sep. 17 | 0–0–0 | N/A | 0.00u | 0.0000u | N/A |
Rank performance
| Rank | W-L-P | Win rate | Units / ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pick 1 | 1–1–0 | 50.00% | Unavailable |
| Pick 2 | 2–0–0 | 100.00% | Unavailable |
| Pick 3 | 2–0–0 | 100.00% | Unavailable |
| Picks 4–5 | 0–0–0 | N/A | N/A |
Market and favorite/underdog performance
| Category | W-L-P | Win rate | Units / ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Point spreads | 5–1–0 | 83.33% | Unavailable |
| Favorites | 5–1–0 | 83.33% | Unavailable |
| Underdogs | 0–0–0 | N/A | N/A |
| Totals / moneylines / props | 0–0–0 | N/A | N/A |
Unit-sizing performance
Unavailable. The recovered September 5 reports did not state unit assignments. No sizing bucket, risk total, profit or ROI has been invented.
Closing-line value
Certified aggregate CLV is unavailable, not 0%. The recovered reports preserve spread thresholds but not a complete timestamped same-sportsbook entry-versus-close series.
Strengths
- The recovered card won five of six positions.
- Pick 2 and Pick 3 were each 2–0.
- The recovered favorite/spread bucket was 5–1, though the sample is only six wagers.
Weaknesses
- Pick 1 split 1–1 and contained the only loss.
- Unit profitability, sizing efficiency and CLV cannot be calculated.
- Twenty-five completed dates remain unresolved; one graded date is not a durable performance sample.
Data-integrity exceptions
- The required performance row uses numeric zero in the unit fields only because the current schema has no null option; the report-level unit metrics are unavailable, not 0.00u.
- September 15, 16 and 17 are verified no-action dates; other missing completed dates remain unresolved.
- September 18 is not yet a settled date at this publication cutoff.
- No additional positions, prices, units, settlements or CLV are inferred.
Model changes: none.
